really annoying to keep seeing this that GP is better when MS doesn't even have an interesting high quality new exclusive games on it, even on this article in the picture they keep showing time after time the same effing games Halo, Gears heck is that Lara on left?, lol, also they aren't even in top spot in this game industry, so what's the deal to keep saying GP is better?, to multiplataform games?, PS already has that now with similar service but with Sony we have PS exclusives, and that is instantly is miles better no freaking doubt imo.
Sony themselves said they were 3-5 years behind. And Xbox GamePass had captured what 60-70% of the gaming subscription market in their letter to Brazils FTC equivalent? I’m pretty sure Sony knows the numbers a lot better than you do.
Right if the own company admits to being behind and fans are still in denial that’s when you know you have a problem.
But in all seriousness people don’t understand the value of it. People just want to act like fanboys game pass has so many games on it high quality ones for $10 a month do people not understand that? That’s a steal. You can literally try any game on it instead of paying for one $70 game you pay $10 and play as many games as you heart can handle. You can try. Games you normally wouldn’t bother buying and discovering whether you like it or not. Like most streaming services people are just blind it’s not about Sony vs Microsoft. It’s the value both services give their customers.
So, who are the other 40-30%? I seriously don't think this is the win you are looking for. None of the other major players in the gaming industry have a subscription service like GP, I highly doubt T2, Sony, Valve, Nintendo, Ubisoft and others are interested. EA is honestly the closest. If there are 25M or let's say 27M GP subscribers and that makes up 60-70% of the industry, that should show you that isn't a lot and the market is small.
I am also more than confident Sony is more than capable of doing day 1, they have done so with some AA games, however they don't have the cash to burn like Xbox in hopes it becomes successful. I personally do not see GP ever reaching the numbers of Netflix, Disney+ or Spotify, so it will be interesting to see how many subscribers GP needs to be profitable and if MS would keep going if it doesn't.
People seriously can't comprehend anything other than what their own bias wants them to these days. Sony is talking 3-5 years behind.... In terms of subscription numbers. That means (drumroll..) they think it'll take roughly 4 years to see that many subscriptions to their service. This isn't complicated stuff people
"This is what Sony said about GamePass in document filings in Brazil: Sony said that Game Pass had collected approximately 60-70 percent of the global market for subscription services in the past five years. A market share of Brazil is actually higher, with 70-80% of the PC subscription services generating Game Pass. Sony believed that being able to become a rival to Microsoft’s subscription service, even with substantial investments, would require several years for the rival to succeed.
Sonys first-party success was quite strong since the PS5s launch, but it thinks Game Pass is quite a threat. The service may change if the acquisition of Activision Blizzard is approved. If Sony doesn’t agree, its most likely to be able to offer Call of Duty on the PlayStation console, particularly given its high popularity."
But I guess all the thumbs-down votes are salty PS fans? All I did was post the truth of what Sony themselves said. Anyone who likes the PS+ sub-models better is great for them. But as of now, Sony doesn't see it that way.
Gamepass is definitely more then 10 a month dont fib for no reason. Dont also act like there isnt great games on plus. I havent touched my xbox in months and i have gamepass. I have seen about 3 games release in that time that i have interest in. I also adore indies so i know about trying new games.
Given that PC sub are likely counted along with console, saying "60-70% of the gaming subscription market" - in a specific country no less - is all that big a deal. As is the subscription market in general.
Worrisome in regards to game quality, but in and of itself.
Even if it will take Sony 3-5 years to "catch up", do Xbox gamers think that's a long time? How long have they been waiting for Microsoft to "catch up" to Sony in regards to consistent, quality AAA output? I'm sure Playstation gamers will be fine for the next 3-5 years playing great games while Sony waits for the subscription numbers to balance out.
@shijoff and crows are you guys illiterate? I said that game pass is a great service that it gives to its consumers Xbox owners. I said it’s not about Sony vs Microsoft. I never mentioned plus lol learn how to read both of you. Plus is also a great service to PlayStation owners lol if it makes you guys sleep better at night. These types of services are great to all consumers it’s a steal.
Sony Fanboys will never acknowledge Microsoft does anything better or has anything better. Never. Maybe small stuff, but that is about it. Even if Sony admits so much, Sony's fans still will have nothing to do with it. That is just how it is.
I have PS Extra and Gamepass and I would say Gamepass does edge itself ahead of PS Extra but Sony has put up a solid start so far all things considered. Both have some great games on there but Gamepass has quite a few newer releases. The downside is there's a lot of filler on both services of you're not massively into some indie games.
I also find whilst gamepass has newer titles, the titles available on Gamepass are not in the same league as Sony first party titles if we're being honest.
Salty are we? Clear it’s a good strategy and Sony knows this hence the uptick in the service offerings as well as PS games on PC. Why does everyone keep acting like MS only makes bad decisions when clearly they have been the real ones leading ecosystem advancement not just games. Reason they have two different sized pockets. Sony needs this.
I think it's mostly a fear of the competition paired with some of Sony's recent terrible moves and backtracking this gen. behind the scenes Sony is on the ropes and is very desperately trying to catch up and find a new strategy that works, the whole 3-4 exclusives a year being their saving grace won't cut it this gen. There are so many ways for people to get and access 100s of games now, that people's attention is constantly jumping all over the place.
Do you really think that a future of low budget indies and MTX filled games that can survive the new subscription dynamic are better than the type of big budget single player games without DLC and MTX that Sony was offering consumers before Microsoft forced this market change?
Because I don't.
I think that in 10 years, people will look back at those 3-4 games a year we had on PS4 and wish we still had that level of budget and quality. Much like many people miss the days of the PS2 when you could buy a game and get the whole game on a disk that you actually owned.
@domination actually there is ample evidence that most gamespass games will be nicrotransaction filled and geared towards being games as a service and multiplayer. Why? Well part of it is about profitability the second part is you need people to remain subscribed not subscribe for a month- then unsubscribe and wait for thr next big title theybare interested in and resubscribe. You need to keep them subscribed and spending money.
"@domination actually there is ample evidence that most gamespass games will be nicrotransaction filled and geared towards being games as a service and multiplayer."
I think we are talking about different things. My point was mainly that there's no evidence that MS are telling their studios to churn out half finished games every six months to fill a game pass quota. Everything announced so far has been longterm projects. Not saying that will stay the same in future but right now, MS are making AAA games and releasing them day one on Game Pass with largely free post-release content.
It isn't really true at all on the multiplayer comment and speculative at best on MTX. They are there of course but "ample evidence" is hyperbole at this point.
Halo Infinite: F2P multiplayer focused with MTX FH5: Single player & Multiplayer - only MTX is a treasure map for the collectibles. Has been a feature in all Horizon games way before Game Pass ever came along. Has free monthly updates and major expansion is free for game pass subscribers MSFS - Single player game. Monthly world updates are all free to download. Top Gun expansion is free. There is a marketplace for third-party vendors to sell their creations. Psychonauts 2 - Single player Age of Empires IV - single player Grounded - ??? - I haven't played but I believe it's a multiplayer focused F2P but with no MTX. Correct me if I'm wrong.
They just published a game called As Dusk Falls - a single player story-driven game. Next up: Starfield. A single-player story-driven game. No information (as far as I know?) on MTX. I imagine it will have the creators club but existed before Game Pass, not a product of it. Redfall: Multiplayer focused game. No information available on MTX or if it's a F2P game as far as I'm aware Hellblade II - single player Forza Motorsport: Single player focused with multiplayer modes The Outer Worlds 2: Single player Avowed: Single player Fable: Single player Perfect Dark: Single player with multiplayer modes Pentiment - single player Contraband - Co-op focused - no further information at this stage Everwild - single player
As long as PS plus only has old games that you probably already own it can't compete with day one games on Gamepass at no extra charge. No one only plays "AAA exclusives" if so you are missing out on a lot of great games. Plus, since it looks like Sony all it's games on PC does Sony really have any exclusives?
Also games like "Death loop" and future COD are $70 on PS5 and included with Gamepass.
Exactly, as is, PS PLUS is on par if not better than Gamepass, especially if someone has missed out on some of Sony’s high quality first party games. Then its not even a comparison.
Next year and beyond the difference is really going to shine through. Eventually Sony will have to adopt some kind of approach to adding newer games. You severely underestimate the power of that day one release schedule for all first party games.
Sure you may not like Halo or any of the Xbox exclusives that are on there but there are exclusive games on there and they are great. Forza Horizon 5 is great Halo is great. Just because you don't personally like those doesn't mean they aren't great games. Halo gets a lot of flack but it's mostly just because people want more of it because it's a great game. Also stuff like Psychonauts 2, Ori games, etc are on there. There's also millions of gamers that didn't buy or play an Xbox One and pretty much all of those Xbox One exclusives are on there. There really are some gems stuff like Quantum Break, Sunset Overdrive, Rare Replay, Sea of Thieves, all the Gears and Halo games, etc.
Another thing you're overlooking is the Discovery Factor. There are new games coming to the pass on an almost weekly basis. Stuff that is just coming out. It's not all first party stuff that's day one. There are all these games that a lot of people wouldn't take a second look at that are finding success because of the subscription. If you don't play it you wouldn't know.
I subscribe to both I think they're both great services in their own right. But Game pass just has a leg up because they've been around longer. The quest system things of that nature the rewards all of that stuff that Sony has not implemented into PS plus yet are also differentiators. But the big deal in the coming year and beyond will be when all of the big games they have been working on finally come out.
I'm particularly stoked for Redfall and Starfield and Big Time releases like that are included on day one! I've already subscribed for the next several years so the fact that I don't have to pay $60 to $70 per game for all these big games that are coming is huge for the millions of gamers that have subscribed. And there's going to be a lot more people subscribing once the Activision Blizzard merger goes through!
Why does SONY have to copy gamepass? They sell way more games than Xbox. Third party games sell way more on playstation. Elden Ring sold 40% on playstation vs 16% on xbox and 44% on pc. Basically all the sales were on pc and playstation. I bet Call of Duty sells more on playstation too. All the big sellers sell like 2 to 1 on ps.
Exactly!!! Also MS is willing to pay for 3rd party games to release Day and Date on Game Pass as well. RE 8 for example would have been on Game Pass when it released if Sony did not pay Capcom to block it.
So there is even more incentive to choose Game Pass over PS+
I mean, Gamepass came out years after PS Now, on a console that has less overall sales than Playstation, yet destroyed PS Now so much they had to cut the system entirely and hide it within the PS Plus numbers.
PS Now had abysmal numbers, so they just rolled it into another tier of PlayStation Plus; a service you need to play most games online.
How many of you defending GP are paying full price on per month basis? Serious question
Until Ms are getting retail MSRP on per month basis/recurring payments they aren't making PROFIT
agnosticgamer
Xbox is 10 years behind PlayStation when it comes to quality of games. I am a GP user who's signed up for next 34-35 months and there has been anything good on it in a while. Most of the times we are playing backwards compatible games on XSX
For as much praise as cult like fanboys give to these corporations I wish the same people would be up in arms about not getting great games but instead on social media they are praising Phil Spencer around the clock
I could careless about the plastic box and GP would be an amazing service when Ms cam produce 5-8 exclusives every year(they own so many IP's and studios that in 3-5 years time they should be able to get on a steady schedule)
for me personally, I try to earn enough bing search points to get a free month every now and then. but in the meantime, i just let it renew every 3. It just did the other day for $45. Kind of wished they offered a yearly for less like they used to for gold. Maybe they will but for now i just pay whatever it is.
Lol another armchair genius. It’s called a loss leader. Look it up. It attracts customers using low cost services then makes money on add ons etc. They make more money off the add ons overall as more the money saved on game purchases is reallocated to add ons that have ridiculous profit margins. They only have to sell a few million skins at $5 each (per game average) to justify the entire system at scale.
PSNow us nowhere near as good as gamepass. I don’t even have an Xbox, I have gamepass on Pc and a ps5. They’re not comparable. Gamepass is extremely good value.
PS Plus is already a better service because of New and legacy titles that Xbox can only dream of getting. Playstations first party games alone overshadows everything on GamePass currently.
GP is obviously a threat to Sony no matter your spin. I like PS exclusives just like the next man, but I also like MS exclusives, which they do have as well. It just seems like the only argument people have in defense of Sony is...they have exclusives! guess what? so do all of the big 3 and in that case, it's a matter of preference, not everyone is into long-drawn-out similar cinematic Sony games, by the way, many are starting to pop up on PC as well. When you look at other features, services, price of games, community, BC, GP attractive price with the ability to play on PC, tablets, web browsers, and cell phones, and future prospects from recent acquisitions, its not impossible to see why some may like Xbox or GP as a better option.
I am not saying one system is better than the other overall, I'm just pointing out that some people make it seem like it's an insta-win for Sony.
I agree! It’s too much emotional attachment to these systems. To the point where it’s childish. Like fans are really upset that there is value in something they have no plans trying.
What xbox has to offers pales in comparison to what we have already seen from PS. We haven’t even seen what will be announced for 2023-2024 other than Spider-Man 2, Wolverine, and from Square, Forspoken, FF 16 and FF7 Rebirth etc.
I need to see Xbox offer more they have already to see them as a viable threat. Yes, in terms of GP vs PS plus, that could be a different story entirely. Without day and date Sony still has more subscribers. Sony will also likely be adding much more to PS extra/premium over the coming months including day 1 AA games.
I think there is great value on both sides, but I would still say Sony is keeping a close eye on this deal and do have legitimate concerns when it comes to service vs service.
As long as PS churns out great games and they still sell like they have been, their business model won’t change much, like Nintendo. But they will offer more on their service to appease those kind of gamers and will be porting games more often to PC.
That is all a win win for Xbox and PS in my eyes. But Sony will likely remain dominant in the market next to Nintendo. Where they could possibly lose is in services unless PS Plus grows with much more content. (And atm Sony still has the lead).
This is all merely opinionated and based on the current data we have. This is how I see it.
MS exclusives ? like the usual gears, forza, halo? I'll add fable to that and project Gotham racing and flight sim but what else ? Quantum break, ryse? That's about it for 20 years of Xbox. I'm sure I'm missing one or two but I think you get my point for 20 years of Xbox
Except what you say is the argument isnt actually the argument. Nobody is buying xbox exclusives. Everyone is buying playstation exclusives. See the difference? So when people say xbox gamepass is better because of day 1 exclusives...first thats not a good sign and second those exclusives need to be desirbale. IF playstation extra will offer all playstation exclusives 6+ months after release thats so much better than what gamepass has in store. Sure gamepass will offer quick access to now bought IP like elder scrolls and starfield BUT thats not actually good for those games.
IF you dont understand this let me do some simple math. Assume there are 30 million gamepass subscribers. In the month of starfields release those 30 million ALL pay $10 to access that game. Thats 300 million dollars for Starfield...although we know the $10 dont all go to starfield so Im being very generous. ON the other hand assume maybe 10 million people would buy Starfield at $60 in the same month of its release. That would make starfield 600 million dollars and ALL of it would go to starfield.
Do you see the problem here? Gamepass day 1 games from their exclusive dev teams only means that if they dont bring in the subscribers to make up for it then those studios will be downsized. Eventually disbanded or mishandled like so many Microsoft studios in the past. You need money to run a business and no business runs on a net loss.
Oh and gamepass with less features is more expensive than ps extra.
The reason neither Playstation or Nintendo needs to offer their 1st party games on any service because their games sell extremely well. Don't forget the reason Xbox had to move to Gamepass to try to stay relevant being in 3rd place, with entries of Gears, Halo etc dropping to their lowest series sales.
Spiderman, Uncharted, Pokemon, Smash, Mario and flagship titles do so well it would be a huge loss to lose their day 1 sales, can the same be said for Halo, Gears, Forza? Nope, sales don't even compare.
The Sony exclusives are the types of games that would be perfect for a subscription service like PS Now and Game Pass. They're typically single player, one and done rentals. I do own multiple copies of The Last of US lol.
Oh boy here we go. First Sony stans complaining and hated on GP. Now that PS has a version instantly they’re better. Geez you all must be huffing that good stuff. Serious delusional fan mouth foaming.
They'll say anything to continue their Gamepass day one narrative. Plus Extra and Premium offer tons to play. Subscriptions are garbage by their logic unless the games are brand spanking new, yet nothing worthwhile has released for GP since Halo. Would rather get the best of both worlds with Playstation. Can get newish games without sacrificing first party quality. If I have to have a game day one, just support the developer and buy it.
PS Plus has far more GOTY winners and nominated games.
And are you really trying to claim that Game Pass has more variety than PS Plus? PS Plus has around 3x as many games covering every single genre. Premium has 400 games alone, Premium has more classic games than Game Pass has in total.
So I am going to call B.S. on both your quality and variety claims.
I agree with the money part, It's always about how much money MS has but as for the "far superior games", lol that's so far from reality it's ridiculous to even suggest.
MS is the only company I know that can pretty much not do anything but push a sub service, and still get articles like this. Any other company would be getting crapped on. I guess some companies really can do the bare minimum, and get loyal fans for life.
Sony has more high quality games on their service from multiple generations, costs less yearly and makes more money annually with less players. What am I missing that Sony's not doing right?
**While PS Plus Premium has some advantages over Game Pass, its subpar game offerings and loyalty to the original brand has Sony facing an uphill battle.**
Sony didn't give away MLB. Some shady company worked behind the scenes with the MLB and forced it over instead of making their own baseball game. I mean, they are only worth 2 TRILLION right? Guess that's not enough money to make a quality baseball game themselves.
You say more players are migrating towards game pass, but where are the numbers? Why are Sony's systems still outselling their competitors worldwide?
Exactly, the amount of series S/X consoles sitting collecting dust without GP would be very high. You'd think Xbox fans would be more vocal to MS approaching 2 years in and only really forza and halo infinite to show for it. It's actually really embarrassing what content MS has put out so far.
Honestly, playstation hasn't exactly been flooding the market with games the last 2 years either. Both companies have had a slow start, and with MS buying like 20 studios a few years ago, it takes time for them to make games (yes, games take 4 or 5 years). I imagine in a year or so games will be coming out pretty consistently
ANd halo infinite was unfinished...that bothered be quite a bit. Good thing I paid a dollar to play it. LOL
@LabRat Yeah sony only released Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart, SPiderman Miles Morales, Demons Souls Awesome Remake, Returnal, Tlou2, Ghost of Tsuhima and Horizon Forbidden West. PRobably a few more I missed but yea...nothing at all..Nothing even remotely critcially acclaimed and gotyr potential. And about to release God of War Ragnarok...all fully fleshed out and finished titles....except for maybe tlou2 missing multiplayer.
As a person with both I find articles like this bizarre. GP has a bunch of nothing. It’s crazy the amount of positive publicity given to a service that you can literally scroll through the entire catalog and just turn the system off out of boredom.
I am afraid to say that I tend to find this is the case too. Because I buy games I want on PS5 I pretty much go on Gamepass once a month to quickly check what's been added before going back to PS5 to play the games I have bought.
The first 3 months I had my Series X were amazing as I played through maybe 12 games I was interested in but once I had worked through those ir is kinda slim pickings for the most part.
What a sad time in gaming. People are talking more about subscription services than actual games. I remember when we used to talk about games that are coming out. Now all I here is I have Gamepass lol. Ok congrats.
I'm not going to sit here and pretend that a lot of games on both of the services are old games most likely you already owned or played. Y'all keep up that good fight. All this is another bullet point to fanboy about.
The new ps plus is already better than GP, I don't understand these articles. Does Sony do day 1 NO, but it's hardly like GP is putting anything decent out regularly. When the MS and the new studios stop playing the next year card things might be different sure but at the moment there not there yet.
Dude, PS+ has already caught up. The lowest tier of PS+ is only $5/month (less with deals) and consistently outclassed Games with Gold. The Extra tier has some of the best games ever made such as Ghost of Tsushima and started with day 1 releases of gems like Stray. Loving it.
You can market xbox and gamepass as much as you want but to me and many more they can’t correct the mistakes of the past 10+ years . Too many hopes promises and lies and not much to show for it but a rental service for mostly old games with filler and the hope for a good first party game someday . Sounds like pay to wait for E3 to me . They had you guys waiting for E3 without paying now they don’t .
The best they could get from me someday is buying a used console at the end of gen and buying some used games but they haven’t had anything really worth buying since midway through 360 nothing last gen and nothing the first 2-3 years this gen .
Xbox is so far behind in games that I can’t get anywhere else . . I know wait and wait some more I’ve heard it for over 10 years . Starfield doesn’t look to be the one game it was hyped to be with the details it looks like a No Man’s Sky rip off where you can’t land on planets manually so now I’m looking at ES6 and Fallout as possibilities but that’s 3-4-5+ years away . AAA Hellblade doesn’t interest me much I thought it was better as an AA game and fit that mold but maybe that would be one. I know it will be hyped and scored as best thing ever like Deathloop was but is it really good ? Deathloop wasn’t for sure especially compared to the scores . Perfect Dark is in development hell already so nope. Everwild was a concept and had no direction at all when it was announced because they had to make it look like they had more than what was reality and we have heard nothing since not a peep. Can’t think of much else they mentioned worth noting . They are great at marketing to a certain large gullible segment for sure . It’s almost like a cult now as we hear the games are coming but Gamepass is cheap and I get new free games someday Someday!!!
Well...I am interested in Hellblade...but yeah...that doesnt look good for anything coming in the future. With playstation we got Wolverine after ragnarok...and maybe the multiplayer thing for the last of us. Other than that....playstation is gonna be making announcements soon after ragnarok.
I guess we have tlou part 1 remake though I hate that price tag.
I have GamePass and I have premium plus. GP is miles ahead of Premium plus. Both have fillers sure but plus is also filled with PS3 games that can only be streamed and from my experiences with them (like Castlevania LoS2) they are unplayable. I have Fiber internet which is extremely fast and still those ps3 games are terrible to stream. That alone devalues premium plus for me. I already own all Sony exclusives (I mean who wouldn’t if you have a PS right?) so the exclusives on plus do not appeal to me. GP is definitely the superior service and once MS starts rolling out their exclusives next year it will advance the gap even further. Sony themselves are afraid of GamePass yet you fanboys STILL make excuses….
"Sony themselves are afraid of GamePass yet you fanboys STILL make excuses…. "
And with that all your credibility as an impartial multi-console owner went right out the window. Tell us you don't own a Playstation without telling us you don't own a Playstation, mission accomplished.
Not only do I own ALL consoles I’m willing to bet I e been a psn member as long if not longer than you. So your logic is ridiculously flawed. I don’t care about having credibility on a Website known to harbor Sony fanboys and lean heavily towards Sony. I come here to laugh at the hypocrisy that some of you a capable of with a straight face. Feel free to check my comment history you will find ZERO hypocrisy and you will find that I criticize BOTH consoles constantly. It’s not my fault that Sony is the one making all the anti consumer moves and crying like a school girl over the MS deal.
I think Sony sees now that Xbox players hand over money for next to nothing, and, in contrast, some Sony fans are complaining about their AAA exclusives going up to $70 this gen (which, at twice a year, is about the same cost of $10 a month more for Game Pass; and Game Pass doesn’t even need to produce an exclusive that year or even the next: Xbots are happy with whatever is on the spoon being shoved down their throat that year.).
Sony needs a similar profit margin opportunity, but they might be out of luck there since they spoiled their fans with AAA exclusives instead of making them think they didn’t need them, like SOMe COMPANIES.
It’s all about customer expectations, and M$ has primed its users for lower expectations than Sony fans. Prove me wrong. Why else would anyone buy a $500 console without a SINGLE game to sell it on.
Answer: lowered expectations and blind brand loyalty.
Clearly you have an axe to grind against MS. Last time I checked I have TONS of games to play on my Xbox so I’m not sure what console you are referring to when you say not a SINGLE game to sell. Calling people “Xbots” is lame and only shows your maturity level which is that of a 9th grader apparently. All those Sony exclusives you love so much majority of them are now on PC so that exclusives line PS fanboys love to spew out their mouths is slowly coming to an end. You’re sitting here blindly following Sony when they don’t care about YOU or their customers. You might want to go outside and cool off buddy…
Yes, there’s definitely an axe to grind when loyal customers can no longer expect quality titles on any kind of regular basis out of their platform creators. We’ve spent far too much money and waited far too long for what?…more services? Where are the medium defining games? It’s like they completely quit trying to compete and went out and bought a whole new roster just to say they have something, but it’ll be another 2-4 years before you see any of it. So why release a new console with nothing to show for over a year and then a huge gap following immediately? Doesn’t really inspire a lot of confidence or show any actual passion and talent. I say this having owned every gen of Xbox to date, including (2) series X. I’m still waiting to be impressed, and old indie games and multi plats aren’t gonna do it. I’m not looking for bargains, I’m looking for can’t be missed experiences.
I agree with FlavorLav pretty thoroughly. Couldn’t have said it better myself, so much of this will be redundant to his post; but it will address every single point you made to me.
I owned every Xbox as well, including an XsX. I chose the OG Xbox over the famed ps2, and I have no regrets there.
So, with that said: 1) Tell me ONE game that you can only play on XsX, just a single attempt by the world-renowned M$ to push the medium with their brand new “stronger” hardware.
My ps5 has Demon Souls, R&C, Returnal, and a ton of games that make excellent use of the Dualsense features, which I LOVE (HLL, R6, GoT, Death Stranding, Sifu, Spider-Man, and many more)
What medium-pushing experiences were curated for my XsX?
2) Calling Xbox diehard loyalists that never acknowledge the Xbone/XsX game drought outload “Xbots” is not offensive because it fits. I loved Halo 1-3, and I payed for Live for decades. I remember the good days, so I refuse to keep telling myself “the games are coming” like a robot….err… Xbot.
Promises were not fulfilled, and Xbots forget. I don’t forget.
3) Sony games that come to PC arrive ~5 years later, well after they’ve moved Sony consoles through exclusivity, so that devs can recoup more profits from their work. I’m totally okay with that, and I also totally am unwilling to wait 5 years for Spider-Man 2, Wolverine, or LoU3.
Xbots don’t seem to mind waiting, so I get it if you’d rather play them all on pc in 5 years instead. Totally your call.
4) I’m not sure what you meant by me “sitting here blindly following Sony when they don’t care about YOU or their customers”. Is that in reference to Sony games coming to pc 5 years later? Idk, you get a little disjointed tbh
Lots of people have an axe to grind when it comes to MS and rather you like it or not the majority of those people are from their actual fan base who have had to deal with disappointment after disappointment, the fan base has had enough waiting around and getting half arsed versions of the games they were promised from MS, they have every right to be upset and no amount of gamepass superiority talk is going to fix that.
That's like saying you're clearly a fanboy for propping up Xbox and defending it so adamantly without having some constructive criticism for Gamepass. Like saying 1st party day one content is such a difference maker, but, not also going to Xbox and asking for better content or more content. 2 games in a YEAR is NOT a lot of day 1 content. Nor is the quality being generally worse like Halo Infinite. So let's not pretend Xbox 1st party comes close to Playstation or Nintendo's offerings in any way.
Your comment about Playstation games on PC doesn't even make sense. None of them are day one. So you want to talk about blindly following anything its you following Xbox and Gamepass. Calling people fanboys just shows how much you are one too.
If you have tonnes of content on Xbox then maybe spend less time making stupid comments and more time playing this service you're propping up. Lol. Not everyone has the same opinion.
Here another opinion. It will be impossible for Microsoft to ever again have a game that makes one BILLION DOLLARS ? Or that reach the numbers that Sony blockbuster REACH... In term of profit comparing something almost free to something that cost each 69.99.... Well. Microsoft better pray they start reaching the billion gamers that Phil Spencer talks or else...
I am going to start a new subscription service, which is better than GP, because you can play any games that I release 10 days before it releases, the only problem is there are no games but it is ok, it is still a better service.
Again with this delusional crap...Smfh. ''The bronze medalist is in reality the gold medalist because that's how my feelings are''...Dislike all you want but facts are facts and until the numbers change all they can do is hope, wish and pray. If you want to claim something back it up with facts. https://twitter.com/Zuby_Te... https://www.dualshockers.co...
Again with your hypocrisy and invented claims, there's nothing toxic about the facts I just posted. Those two links above must be like kryptonite for you huh. The truth hurts I guess. You seemed vexed, try yoga maybe?
So why do you spend so much time in Xbox post? Shouldn't you have too many game options on Gamepass to have time to comment? Oh guess there's not enough good content to keep you busy so you're here posting?! So let's not pretend you're not toxic yourself
@Aloymetal That's a pretty disingenuous comparison.
PS+ includes people who are just paying for the basic tier / online play. GP does not. If you want a more accurate comparison you would need to compare XBL+GP vs PS+. Unless you can obtain per-tier numbers for PS+.
The whole point of stupid Xbox metrics is to hide absolutely terrible Xbox 1st party sales numbers. Like what are the sales of say Halo? Forza? Gears? See that goes both ways doesn't it? All we know is how many miles were driven or equally stupid metrics. So let's not pretend Xbox isn't hiding behind dumb metrics. Like how many people are paying full price for Gamepass? Or how they calculate anything of any meaning?! I could tell you 10 million people played Halo Infinite, but, for all you know I could of played for 2 minutes and it registered me as 'playing ' the game.
Who cares. As of now the only difference is that GP has some current titles but most of those current titles are some Indie games along with some low budget games. If you keep up with buying & playing current titles especially AAA games, GP & PS Now are just ok sub services.
I don't think it ever will. Not that Game Pass is a make or break service for a platform. But it's definitely more appealing than I expected it to be at the beginning. Microsoft already has tens of billions invested in those massive Azure server farms all over the world. Not only is Sony unable to afford that type of investment, they don't feel it's necessary. They're probably right. At least until they have a good "ecosystem" that would make that upfront investment.
Lol. The only thing ps plus doesnt offer is 1st party day one(whuch ms hasnt all year either) Weve seen them do 3rd party day one. Sony will end up offering more 3rd oarty day ones at some point but i dont see it as catch up
The games overall though imo ps plus has better games. Playstation has always had better games
phil put out, a free to play halo game, because gamepass is doing so well phil rushed out, a half baked, free to play halo game because gamepass is doing so well Phil sells 15 dollar skins, for his free to play halo game because gamepass is doing so well
PS+ with 3x the subscribers is absolutely destroying gamepass
Game Pass is great, but PS Now and Plus are almost just as good. Scorn, and Plague Tale are the biggest new games coming soon to GP. Plague Tale should be great. Scorn maybe, but wait and see.
Sony is definitely making their subscriptions well worth the money. The value is fantastic.
Umm. Why is it that journos keep promoting gamepass as some kind of holy grail? Its not that good at all. Its just a cheap subscription service. No different than ps extra. Just with less features and more expensive. PS extra gives you tons more value than basic gamepass.
Exclusives day 1 mean nothing if theyre not any good. And even if they are good it doesnt magically make the dozens of playstation exclusives on the service void. Gamepass is still playing catch up to psnow (now called ps extra). While gamepass touts exclusives day 1, ps extra actually has many worthwhile exclusives that have actually released.
The recent fact of Sony being afraid of gamepass is the reason the defense force is out so hard.
It hurts and they are afraid, just as Sony is worried as well. Sony themselves said MS is 60-70% of gaming sub services. Then there is the whole blocking games on GP, then there is the attempt to stop the A/B acquisition, they are most certainly afraid and scrambling.
Then we get to the awful moves they have been making, $70 games, 10 live service games in development. We can then move on to them playing catch up with an inferior sub service, weak B/C, late with VRR, late with 1440p support,.
Then we can move on to the Sony only fans, GP sucks, but PS+ is good...Sony believes in generations and then puts out tons of cross platform games, all MS games are on PC anyway, yet Sony is now pushing PC games hard now. Halo infinite is a MTX garbage, then Sony put out GT7 with tons of expensive MTX but still charges you $70 for the game. MS buying studios and Sony grows studios...then Sony buys Bungie...live service games sucks...sony develops 10, and all the fans love it..lol..so hypocritical its laughable.
really annoying to keep seeing this that GP is better when MS doesn't even have an interesting high quality new exclusive games on it, even on this article in the picture they keep showing time after time the same effing games Halo, Gears heck is that Lara on left?, lol, also they aren't even in top spot in this game industry, so what's the deal to keep saying GP is better?, to multiplataform games?, PS already has that now with similar service but with Sony we have PS exclusives, and that is instantly is miles better no freaking doubt imo.
PS Plus is already a better service because of New and legacy titles that Xbox can only dream of getting. Playstations first party games alone overshadows everything on GamePass currently.
It's true, Game Pass has far superior games 1st and 3rd party with a massive variety not just 3rd person narrative games.
There is a reason it's called the Best Deal in Gaming and it will remain that way especially with the addition of ABK games.
Sony just can't compete they just don't have the money to make the same deals MS can.
MS is the only company I know that can pretty much not do anything but push a sub service, and still get articles like this. Any other company would be getting crapped on. I guess some companies really can do the bare minimum, and get loyal fans for life.
I'd rather have the better exclusives than a subscription service, just sayin 🤷♂️